Tests fail at random
Retries hide instability and engineers stop trusting red builds.
FOR SMALL SAAS ENGINEERING TEAMS
Ship with more confidence in your tests.
Flaky tests and slow CI pipelines make releases feel risky. Get a practical review of your Playwright/Pytest automation and CI, with a clear health score, your highest-risk findings and a prioritized 30-day plan.
✓ Fixed scope · One repository · Delivered within 48 hours after materials are received
HEALTH CHECKSAMPLE
72/ 100
A starting point for better releases
Test reliability62
Architecture78
CI / CD70
Illustrative score · not a client result
BUILT AROUND THE WORK THAT MATTERSPlaywrightPytestREST APIsGitHub ActionsGitLab CI
THE PROBLEM
When tests lose trust,
releases feel risky.
Flaky checks, slow pipelines and unclear test ownership make it harder to know whether a build is ready.
CI takes too long
Feedback arrives late, so small changes become slower to validate.
Structure has drifted
Fixtures, data and helpers are hard to change without breaking other tests.
A USEFUL DIAGNOSIS, NOT A GENERIC AUDIT
Know what to fix first.
One focused review gives your team an outside view and a practical next step, without signing up for an open-ended engagement.
Explore the review →- 01Health scoreSeven weighted categories, explained
- 02Prioritized findingsEvidence, impact and recommended direction
- 03Quick wins + 30-day roadmapWhat to do now, next and later
YOUR REVIEWER
Senior QA engineer, hands-on with automation.
Oleksandr Lozytskyi has 10+ years in QA and six years focused on test automation across web products, APIs, CI/CD and newer AI products.
His work includes Playwright, Pytest, Java, Python, Selenide and Cucumber, with pipelines in GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps and AWS CodeBuild.
View experience and portfolio ↗PAST TEAM OUTCOMES~30%
fewer pipeline failures
5h → 3hregression runtime reduced
Examples from prior work; not a promised result of this review.A GOOD FIT IF
Your team owns the product and the tests.
- 5–50 engineers building a web product
- Playwright, Pytest, Cypress, Selenium or a similar stack
- Testing is shared between a small QA team and developers
- Your team wants an independent, prioritized view
CLEAR SCOPE. CLEAR PRICE.
Choose the depth you need.
Fixed prices: one repository, one pipeline, one report.
QUICK SCAN
€149
- CI config, test reports and folder structure only
- No product source code needed
- Top 5 risks + quick wins
- Short PDF report
HEALTH CHECK
€349
- One automation repository
- One primary CI pipeline
- PDF report + quick wins
- 30-day action plan
AUDIT + FIX SPRINT
from €1,290
- Everything in Health Check
- Up to 10 hours of fixes as pull requests
- 2 weeks of follow-up questions
- Your audit fee is credited if agreed within 14 days
Quick Scan and Health Check are delivered within 48 hours after all agreed materials arrive. Secure online payment; your order is sent after payment is confirmed. The Fix Sprint is scoped and agreed in writing before work starts.
GOOD TO KNOW
Questions, answered.
What do you need from us?
A repository or archive, a short product and testing context, and access to one main CI configuration. Never send passwords, tokens or secrets.
Do you fix the issues?
The health check is diagnostic. Implementation can be discussed separately after the review.
Is this a security or compliance audit?
No. It reviews QA automation practices and CI configuration; it is not a penetration test, security audit or compliance opinion.
How is private code handled?
Agree a secure transfer method and retention expectations before sharing. An NDA is available on request before you send anything. You can also share read-only access for a few days, or send only your CI config, test reports and folder structure, without any product source code. Customer code and findings are never published without written permission.